Saturday, December 01, 2007

Konecne spravodlivost? (update 2.12.)


Alebo aky je rozdiel medzi rozhodnutim Europskeho sudneho dvoru a Europskeho sudu pre ludske prava?

Teda okrem toho, ze jeden je organ Europskej unie a druhy Rady Europy, jeden sa riadi europskym acquis communautaire a druhy Dohovorom o ochrane ludskych prav a zakladnych slobod.

Jeden rozhodol, ze novinar, ktory publikoval clanky o rozsiahlej korupcii v organoch EU moze byt za to perzekvovany, mozu mu byt jeho materialy zhabane a moze byt hodiny vypocuvany ohladom svojich zdrojov.

Druhy mu prisudi 10 000 Eur za nepenaznu ujmu za porusenie clanku 10 Dohovoru (Sloboda prejavu). Tlacova sprava tu a rozhodnutie sudu (po francuzsky) tu.

Jedna sa o novinara Hans-Martina Tillacka zo Sternu, o nom som uz pisal tu.

Co sa da dodat? Asi nic.

Asi len to co pise dansky europoslanec Jens-Peter Bonde vo svojej knihe:
"In a normal society, founded on the rule of law, you punish those responsible for the crimes. In the Eurostat affair the boss was suspended, but he still receives a full salary and can visit the offices. Those who have been punished in this context are Paul van Buitenen, who first brought attention to irregularities in Eurostat; Marta Andreasen, who showed how easy it was to embezzle all the other accounts and refused to endorse accounts which she was not allowed to control; Dorte Schmidt-Brown, who did her duty when she refused to use taxpayers’ money for false contracts; and, most recently, the journalist who wrote about the affair.

Those that have been punished are those that did their duty. It is hard to believe that this is Europe in the year 2004."


A ako pise samotny Hans-Martin Tillack viceprezidentka komisie pre komunikaciu Margot Wallström, ktora ma v poslednej dobe obrazne plnu hubu ucty pred novinarmi, si zrazu nevie spomenut co sa stalo v jej minulej komisii.

Update 2.12.

Trosku sa o tom rozpisal aj samotny akter tejto aferky - novinar Hans-Martin Tillack na svojom blogu.

OLAF- European Anti-Fraud Office (nazvany v style ministerstiev z knihy 1984 Minitrue a Minipax) na zaklade ktoreho ziadosti belgicky stat vyssie opisane veci spachal (aby nasiel kto materialy novinarovi poskytol miesto toho aby hladal toho kto robil podvody), by nevahal ani do buducna postupovat podobnym stylom, a sef OLAFu vydal tlacove vyhlasenie, kde sa hra na pstrosa.

2 comments:

lemuel said...

jaj, na tuto tillack aferu som temer zabudol, ale opat som zdravo nasrany. dik za clanok. nenie 10K euro malo?

Hamilton said...

Asi tak.

Ale dostal este ako pise mudry sud: "EUR 30,000 for costs and expenses"

Takze aspon nieco.